<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Short Sales 1-2-3 &#187; short sales</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.short-sales1-2-3.com/http:/www.short-sales1-2-3.com/postnametag/short-sales/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.short-sales1-2-3.com</link>
	<description>how to get a short sale approved quickly and easily</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 22:47:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>New Style or Old?</title>
		<link>http://www.short-sales1-2-3.com/http:/www.short-sales1-2-3.com/postname%.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.short-sales1-2-3.com/http:/www.short-sales1-2-3.com/postname%.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 05:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[realtors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[short sale styles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[short sales]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.short-sales1-2-3.com/?p=63</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recently read a blog discussion about new-fashioned &#8220;style&#8221; methods of real estate vs old fashioned &#8220;substance&#8221;. For example, should one do the cool new stylish thing &#8211; Twitter, Facebook, texting or the old reliable door-knock to prospect for short sales? In a time when many people (including realtors like yours truly) are facing the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.short-sales1-2-3.com"><img src="http://www.short-sales1-2-3.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/20081219-twenties-on-white.jpg" alt="short sale styles" title="short sale styles" width="120" height="103" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-64" /></a></p>
<p>I recently read a blog discussion about new-fashioned &#8220;style&#8221; methods of real estate vs old fashioned &#8220;substance&#8221;. For example, should one do the cool new stylish thing &#8211; Twitter, Facebook, texting or the old reliable door-knock to prospect for short sales?</p>
<p> In a time when many people (including realtors like yours truly) are facing the largest financial challenge of their lives, I think it&#8217;s more important to be effective, than just efficient. So I would suggest that agents do the thing that makes the most effective use of their time. Door-knocking, for example, is probably the single most inefficient method of prospecting that has ever been invented, but probably the most effective. I can still remember getting five listings one afternoon as a result of handing out bags of corn on the cob to my farm area the day before. It&#8217;s highly inefficient to buy a bunch of corn, bag it, and then knock on doors and hand it to people. But what a rewarding smile you can get. And what an effective impact it can make. </p>
<p>If your market has heated up recently, you may find that personally delivering a contract may be less efficient than email or fax, but believe me, begging in person is so much more effective. <Grin>.</p>
<p> Technology is great at being efficient, but as others have pointed out, most realtors nowadays will find a marriage between the two works best. And sometimes you just have to stop and ask yourself, &#8220;Wait, am I being effective right now or just efficient.&#8221; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.short-sales1-2-3.com/http:/www.short-sales1-2-3.com/postname%.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
